[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;) |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:24:01 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> > [...]
> >> > That's all bullshit. The FSF simply managed to fool Judge Tinder
> >> > that Wallace lacks standing. Tinder recorgnized that "Plaintiffââ¬â¢s
> >> > Third Amended Complaint States a Claim Upon Which Relief can be
> >> > Granted" and that "Plaintiffââ¬â¢s Allegations Sufficiently Set Forth
> >> > a
> >> > Violation of the Rule of Reason", but he was fooled by FSF's "even
> >> > if it were possible for Plaintiff to allege some harm to competition
> >> > in the abstract, Plaintiff has not alleged antitrust injury to
> >> > himself, and thus lacks standing."
> >>
> >> You have an interesting notion of "fooled".
> >
> > -----
> > Accompanying Injury
>
> [...]
>
> You are fond of your quotation bubbles, but they don't amount to the
They amount to "substantial arguments" explaining to the appelate court
why the district court erred.
> results you want. You don't want to hear it when we explain it to
Try explaining what's wrong with Wallace's argument on injury. Can you?
regards,
alexander.
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/17
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/20
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;),
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/22