[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;) |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:47:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>>
>> > David Kastrup wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >> Then there is no predatory pricing since RedHat is not selling below
>> >> cost at all.
>> >
>> > RedHat sells support, delivery, and maintenance contracts on annual
>> > subscription bases. RedHat's GPL'd IP in pooled derivative and
>> > collective works is price-fixed at "no charge" and is available
>> > gratis.
>>
>> How can one talk about "price-fixed at no charge" in the same
>> paragraph with "sells delivery contracts"? The price obviously is not
>> fixed but variable, and people make use of the variation.
>
> Uh. Ok, once again: RedHat's IP is "price-fixed at no charge" and is
> available gratis. Nothing variable.
I don't see anything like "RedHat IP -- $0" listed on their page. In
fact, they retain their IP and don't give their copyright away. They
provide, however, downloads for $0, so they price a particular form of
_copies_ at no charge. They also price other copy forms at larger
charges. It is like a free art catalogue: you are free to cut and
paste and frame stuff from the catalogue for your home, but they make
their money with people buying the pieces advertised in that manner.
> Ancillary service that they supply is priced far above costs of
> providing the service (above predatory levels) and it is used to
> recoup loses from GPL conspiracy and turn a profit. Got it now?
It is called advertising. People recoup losses from the advertising
conspiracy (there are even whole billboards and gazettes for the sole
purpose of advertising) and turn a profit. This sort of "conspiracy"
is pretty common nowadays. In fact, almost every business does it.
Got it now?
I think that you have omitted invectives and expletives from this
thread for too long now. People will think you are an imposter if you
don't correct this oversight soon.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), (continued)
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;),
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/22
- Message not available
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/21
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/06/22
- Message not available
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/22
- Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;), David Kastrup, 2006/06/22