Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)

[David Kastrup]

Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
>> 
>> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>> 
>> > Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >> > telnet www.danwal.com 80
>> >
>> > Now try telephone.
>> 
>> This is so going to convince a court that Wallace actually attempts
>> to sell something.
>
> Defendants in the Wallace's case have all the rights to challenge
> Wallace status as a competitor. That's what discovery stage in a
> lawsuit is all about.  Don't hope that Wallace is unprepared for
> discovery stage to establish (and defend) the facts he pleaded.

One does not "plead" facts.  Anyway, first Wallace needs to establish
a case before it makes sense checking the veracity of the purported
underlying facts.

> You're exhibiting total ignorance once again.

I assure you that I would not want to tread on your territory.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum