Re: Something about Less General Public License

[Alexander Terekhov]

Byron A Jeff wrote:
[...]
> Which would be accomplished by releasing your code as LGPL since your
> code is derivative from original LGPL code.

OP said that "We got a new library by modifying the LGPL code and 
adding some our own code." Modified LGPL code aside for a moment, what
makes you think that their own code (I take it that he means some code
under independent copyright, and not the modified LGPL code) is a 
derivative from original LGPL code?

Brainwashed GNUtias are fond of jumping to baseless and utterly false 
conclusions...

regards,
alexander.