[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.0
|
From: |
Wei Mingzhi |
|
Subject: |
Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.0 |
|
Date: |
Sat, 1 Jul 2006 09:52:08 +0800 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
I'd recommend dropping the case of "Intellectual Property" as I don't think
this is a strict legalese, just a brainwashing propaganda carried out by some
politicians and big companies. Actually even my law teacher (who is a lawyer)
admits that writting "Intellectual Property" in a contract without
clarification about what it actually means will result in ambiguity. And
there are also _no_ "Intellectual Property" in the actual laws.
pgp2z6YKlxgUn.pgp
Description: PGP signature