[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5 |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Jul 2006 10:37:22 +0200 |
John Hasler wrote:
>
> Rui writes:
> > Because a text is published by some law authority like FTC "is"...
>
> The FTC is an authority only on its own regulations, and a FTC commissioner
> is just a political appointee.
Feel free to recommend defendants (in Wallace case) to hire
http://www.hellerehrman.com/en/attorneys/bios/Azcuenaga_Mary.html
What we've seen thus far from ICE MILLER LLP and BARNES & THORNBURG LLP was
not impressive. You stupid Achilles-can-never-catch-the-tortoise GNUtian
Hasler. http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.misc.discuss/msg/f71df1d860caedbe
regards,
alexander.
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivative distros", Linonut, 2006/07/02
- Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/04
- Message not available
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/05
- Message not available
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/05
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/05
- Message not available
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/05
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/05
- Message not available
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/05
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/05