[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5 |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Jul 2006 11:16:07 +0200 |
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>
> Ter, 2006-07-04 Ã s 19:17 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu:
> > Q: Bzzzzt, but according to RMS, "intellectual property... is a mirage,
> > which appears to have a coherent existence only because the term
> > suggests it does." So bzzzzt, what the fuck ... !?
> >
> > A: Well, well, well. But according to one FTC commissioner (and an
> > antitrust attorney),
>
> Alex, please let me understand your reasoning:
>
> Because a text is published by some law authority like FTC "is", or
> Attoneries are, or even Judges... does that have to be taken as Official
> in the Point of View of Law?
Consider:
http://www.denbar.org/group/index.cfm?category=1105&EntityID=DBA
"...
COURTESY AND CIVILITY
1. We will work together toward resolution of our cases by
being reasonable.
...
6. We will scrupulously refrain from making misleading
statements of law or fact, whether by omission, inference
or implication."
Moglens "license-not-a-contract" and
http://emoglen.law.columbia.edu/research-agenda.html not only violates
the standards, it warrants disbarment. I'm for free speech and all that,
but please... "Professor Of History and *GNU* Law" or something.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: "GPL requirement could have a chilling effect on derivative distros", Linonut, 2006/07/02
- Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/04
- Message not available
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/05
- Message not available
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/05
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/05
- Message not available
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/05
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/05
- Message not available
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/05
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/05
- Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/07/05