[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:57:30 +0200 |
Nimmer:
"Beyond contract interpretation issues, the viral terms of licenses
present legal issues about enforceability. One basis for challenge
lies in the concept of misuse.98 This theory precludes enforcement
of intellectual property rights that have been misused by the rights
owner, including at least in some cases by attempting to leverage
the rights into control of products or work that falls outside the
scope of the licensors property interest. Clearly, the viral terms
in an FSOS license do this, but whether courts would hold that they
are justifiable by the nature of the context and the purpose behind
the license terms remains to be seen."
regards,
alexander.
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/20
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/20
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/20
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/22
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/22
- Message not available
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/24
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/24
- Message not available
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/24
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/24
- Message not available
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, John Hasler, 2006/07/24
- Message not available
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/25
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/07/25
- Message not available
- Re: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/07/26