gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wallace's reply brief

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Wallace's reply brief
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 10:41:17 +0200 
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> Yes, that is what "the physical act of transferring a copy" is all

That is what 17 USC 109 is a about, stupid.

Wallace wants to charge royalties for IP, not "the physical act of 
transferring a copy".

regards,
alexander.
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]