Re: Wallace's reply brief

[John Hasler]

David Kastrup wrote:
> Last time I looked, he was not out for selling his copyright, so he is
> _not_ intending to charge for his IP, but for _licensing_ his IP.

It's hard to tell for sure, but it appears to me that what he wants to do
is sell copies and _not_ license his IP.

> The problem is that Wallace's product has no distinguishing qualities
> setting it apart from existing GPLed software.  So he wants to have the
> GPLed software removed.

That would do him no good: he'd have to write his own.  He wants it placed
in the public domain.
-- 
John Hasler 
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA