[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is source ?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: What is source ? |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Aug 2006 12:22:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> means that copies downloaded from there will be governed by the GPL.
>
> The GPL governs work (rights to it) not copies, stupid.
Nonsense. That would preclude dual-licensing models, for example.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: What is source ?, (continued)
- Re: What is source ?, David Golden, 2006/08/21
- Re: What is source ?, Wei Mingzhi, 2006/08/22
- Message not available
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/22
- Re: What is source ?, Vincent Rivière, 2006/08/06
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/06
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/07
- Re: What is source ?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/07
- Re: What is source ?, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/08/07
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/07
- Re: What is source ?, Tim Smith, 2006/08/19
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/21
Re: What is source ?, Vincent Rivière, 2006/08/12