[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is source ?
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: What is source ? |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:55:17 +0200 |
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
[...]
> There is only a "misstate" if your intention is to foil the copyright
> license by trying to bypass it alledging other dubious things.
17 USC 109 and 117 are statutory rights. They are treated as "dubious"
things only in the GNU Republic (because copyleft is severely weakened
by them). No wonder.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: What is source ?, (continued)
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/14
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/14
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/15
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/15
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/15
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/15
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/15
- Re: What is source ?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/08/15
- Message not available
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/15
- Re: What is source ?, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/08/14
- Message not available
- Re: What is source ?,
Alexander Terekhov <=