[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: license question with non-GPL library
From: |
Scott |
Subject: |
Re: license question with non-GPL library |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:40:28 GMT |
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:01:22 +0200, Merijn de Weerd
<merijn+nospam@realemail.net> wrote:
>Distributors of GPL code are required to make available the full
>source code of all modules, which would include the library. So
>yes you should include the source code of the library with all
>the other source.
Thanks for the replies!
How does this work practically, then? Do I have to distribute the
source code to every library I link to? I understand there is an
exception for system libraries (i.e. libstdc++ and the like), but
where do I draw the line? For example is cairo or freetype considered
a 'system' library, or would I need to redistribute their source as
well? Is a link to their webpage sufficient?
Thanks again for your help,
Scott
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, (continued)
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, David Kastrup, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, David Kastrup, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/08/16
- Message not available
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
Re: license question with non-GPL library,
Scott <=
Re: license question with non-GPL library, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/08/16
Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
Re: license question with non-GPL library, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/08/16
Re: license question with non-GPL library, John Hasler, 2006/08/16