[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: license question with non-GPL library
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: license question with non-GPL library |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:03:23 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> > [...]
> >> GPL because the work as a whole has to be licensed under the GPL,
> >
> > Man oh man. Go back to doctor, retard. Try another one.
> >
> > http://www.usfca.edu/law/determann/softwarecombinations060403.pdf
>
> And another long quote contradicting Alexander. Cute. Again, dearest
> Alexander, like what you quoted tells you, the question is what
> _whole_ work can be considered a derivative of the GPLed work.
And "what _whole_ work can be considered a derivative of the GPLed
work", retard? Go to doctor and tell him that GNU folklore legends
of A+B and "non-standardized" interfaces causing works to be
considered a derivative of the GPLed work in the GNU Republic.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, (continued)
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, David Kastrup, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, David Kastrup, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/08/16
- Message not available
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
Re: license question with non-GPL library, Scott, 2006/08/16
Re: license question with non-GPL library, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/08/16