Re: GNU licenses

[Stefaan A Eeckels]

On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:52:55 +0200
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:

> Sez who? Copying (and distribution) under 17 USC 117 (together with 
> 109), for example, doesn't require a license, stupid. 

Has your teacher failed to tell you that calling people names lends no
credence to your arguments? As a matter of fact, it removes what little
credibility you might have left. 

-- 
Stefaan A Eeckels
-- 
You know, it is almost always the case in the real world that something
is "fair" when you like it and "unfair" when you don't.
                                  -- Jeffrey Siegal in gnu.misc.discuss