Re: Open source - Free software

[Richard Tobin]

In article <mailman.7596.1159548190.9609.gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org>,
Alfred M. Szmidt <ams@gnu.org> wrote:

>   Can you explain the "so" in that sentence?  Why does the fact that
>   it is distributed without fee preclude it from being distributed
>   commercially as well?

>If it is commercially distributed, then it is distributed for a fee,
>no?

Why does the fact that it is distributed without fee preclude it from
also being distributed for a fee?

At this point it's hard to believe that you're arguing in good faith,
so if you come up with another silly response I'm not going to bother
replying.

-- Richard