[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 06:54:40 +0100 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> > That's copyleft logic, not copyright.
>
> Believe what you will.
Hey dak, just FYI, I've suggested to Wallace to go for an en banc
hearing and simply submit
http://www.theregister.com/2006/11/10/gpl_wallace_appeal/
(GPL passes bizarro world anti-trust test)
with
http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2006/11/the_gpl_doesnt.html
(by Matt Asay, Director, Linux Business Office, Novell)
asking for confirmation from all the members of 7th appellate court
whether they ALL live in a bizarro world together with prolific and
learned Chief Judge Frank Easterbrook. (And if they will answer "yes"
then ask the same question in a petition to the Supreme Court.) Thus
far, Wallace replied "why intercede" pointing to the recent MS-Novell
development suggesting the death of free software being crushed under
the weight of thousands Microsoft patents in a competitive "growing,
not shrinking" (according to Chief Judge) operating system market.
If anyone sues Microsoft under Sherman section 2, Microsoft will
simply point to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals decision and
claim "competition is flourishing in the defined market". Will a
district court judge defy an esteemed jurist of the calibre of Judge
Easterbrook in the antitrust arena? You gotta hand it to Judge
Easterbrook. He is a great judge of free and continuing competitive
markets.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, (continued)
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/10
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, David Kastrup, 2006/11/10
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/10
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, David Kastrup, 2006/11/10
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/10
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, David Kastrup, 2006/11/10
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/10
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/13
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/13
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/14
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Richard Tobin, 2006/11/10
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/10
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Richard Tobin, 2006/11/10
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/10
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Richard Tobin, 2006/11/10
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/10
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Richard Tobin, 2006/11/10
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, John Hasler, 2006/11/10
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/10
- Re: EASTERBROOK's "quick look" on the GPL and Wallace's claim, Richard Tobin, 2006/11/10