[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gpl licensing
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: gpl licensing |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Dec 2006 18:54:28 +0100 (CET) |
How the hell do you get "can happily coexist" and "destroying
intellectual property" to logically fit together?
I didn't write anything about mess that is "Intellectual Property",
and strongly disagree with any usage of the word. Not to mention that
copyright law, patent law, and trademark law have absolutley nothing
to do with economic models like communism/capitalism.
It's an economic model that hopes to destroy capitalistic notions
of intellectual property.
Free software has nothing to do with economics. Charging a fee for
writting a program, or distributing it is perfectly OK. Subjugating a
users freedom to run, study, improve and distribute programs is on the
other hand not OK; note that none of these freedoms speak about
"price".
- Re: gpl licensing, (continued)
- Re: gpl licensing, David Golden, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, David Kastrup, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, David Golden, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, rjack, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: gpl licensing, Aragorn, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, rjack, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04