[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
From: |
me |
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
Date: |
13 Mar 2007 17:01:12 -0700 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
can we all please stop talking in parables and references to topics we
may not all share the detailed background knowledge of? I'd like a
straight answer with the entire answer within the text.
is the GPL basically not enforceable assuming you "work around" it
technically by the aforementioned method? Am i strange in thinking
that this is strange?
What I glean is, yes i can, from the user's perspective, "include" a
GPL'd software within my own proprietary software, and NOT be forced
to release my source code? (see previous for what i mean by "include")
- Re: GPL question, (continued)
Re: GPL question, me, 2007/03/10
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/03/10
- Re: GPL question, me, 2007/03/12
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/03/13
- Re: GPL question,
me <=
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/03/13
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/03/13
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/03/14
Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/03/13
Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/03/14
Re: GPL question, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/03/10