[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
Date: |
Tue, 15 May 2007 15:57:09 +0200 |
Richard Tobin wrote:
>
> In article <4649AAC8.16E4BF28@web.de>,
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
>
> >> You can't relicense the work of others under any license you like,
> >> period. Regardless how much or little you add to it.
>
> >This begs a question, dear GNUtian dak. How come that Linux kernel "as
> >a whole" (in GNU speak) isn't under the BSD (all other non-GPL'd works
> >constituting Linux kernel project aside for a moment)?
>
> Because you *can* relicense the work of others under any licence
> that *they* like.
Are you sure that Theo de Raadt and the gang like the GPL? <chuckles>
regards,
alexander.
- GPL question, Bilgehan . Balban, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/21
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/21
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/22
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/24
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/15