[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
From: |
Richard Tobin |
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
Date: |
15 May 2007 14:10:41 GMT |
In article <4649BC4F.83E77D8@web.de>,
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
[presumably court opinions about derivative works - I have no intention
of reading them]
So what wording woud you suggest authors use in their licences if they
wish to prevent their work from being used in this way? Or do you think
authors should be required to allow it?
-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.
- Re: GPL question, (continued)
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/21
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/21
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/22
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/24
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question,
Richard Tobin <=
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/16
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/16
Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/15