[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
From: |
Richard Tobin |
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
Date: |
17 May 2007 22:05:38 GMT |
In article <87ejlfp1ev.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>,
John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org> wrote:
>> On the face of it, no-one has distributed a derivative work, so that
>> there is no infringement to contribute to.
>
>In the US creation of derivatives is one of the exclusive rights of the
>copyright owner.
Ok, but the GPL allows creation of derivative works with minimal
restrictions provided you don't "distribute or publish" them. So
in the readline case there would only be an infringement if the
combined actions of author and user constituted distribution.
-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.
- Re: GPL question, (continued)
- Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/18
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question,
Richard Tobin <=
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/18
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Bilgehan . Balban, 2007/05/23
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/23