[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
Date: |
Fri, 18 May 2007 12:21:47 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> If you are merely using the system call interface of the kernel, you
Use of ANY interface doesn't create a derivative work, stupid. The AFC
test and all that.
> are not involved with creating a derivative work, and as long as the
> customer has a license for running arbitrary programs, there is no
> copyright problem from Apple. But this license _is_ necessary.
Man oh man.
http://www.iuscomp.org/gla/statutes/UrhG.htm#69d
> David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
GNU Republic. (Not Germany.)
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GPL question, (continued)
- Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, David Kastrup, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/17
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/18
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Bilgehan . Balban, 2007/05/23
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/23