Re: GPL question

[Alfred M. Szmidt]

   Although I'm not the asker of the question, this still brings to
   mind the dillemma I haven't quite settled for myself yet. What if,
   say, instead of dual-licensing the _entire work_, he (the asker of
   the original question) tweaked it so the _GPL parts_ could be
   distributed in the package *and also over a website or other
   free-availability source* _UNDER GPL_, while the 90% that is
   _ORIGINAL_ is licensed under proprietary or other non-GPL terms?

The GPL Section 2(b): You must cause any work that you distribute or
publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the
Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to
all third parties under the terms of this License.