[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
Date: |
Tue, 22 May 2007 21:54:03 +0200 (CEST) |
And therefore distributing them even separately through different
channels is considered the same as distributing them as a
whole. So, in other words, the following holds true: If I decide to
use GPL code in my program, I am agreeing to "pay for the code"
with my own code -- because then I am forced to release my own code
as GPL as well. I can't even release it under another "free"
system, no, it must be UNDER THE GPL! What is the point of this?!
To keep programs free.
- Re: GPL question, (continued)
Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/21
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/21
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/22
- Re: GPL question,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/24
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/15