[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU License, Again
From: |
mike3 |
Subject: |
Re: GNU License, Again |
Date: |
23 May 2007 18:27:28 -0700 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On May 22, 3:00 pm, "Alfred M. Szmidt" <a...@gnu.org> wrote:
> > So, it's to create *more* free code, right?
>
> Yes.
>
> It doesn't create anything, nobody is forced to release their work
> under the GPL. It only sees that software that is free, remains so.
>
So then what do you call agreeing to release all the original
code, then, not just the GPL code? Isn't that adding more code
to the repository of free code, e.g. "creating" more free code?
> They could make it available (if at all) only under the
> default copyright terms,
>
> They could, but that would be immoral and unethical.
I disagree to some extent.
- Re: GNU License, Again, (continued)
- Re: GNU License, Again, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, John Hasler, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again,
mike3 <=
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/23
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/23
- Re: GNU License, Again, John Hasler, 2007/05/23
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, Tyler Smith, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/25