Re: GNU License, Again

[Alexander Terekhov]

"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
[...]
>    So then why must it too be free, why must the license require that
>    to be free?
> 
> To keep things free, again, this was answered as well before.

Man oh man, you're krank. Suppose he takes PUBLIC DOMAIN work and 
links it with the GPL'd work. Nobody can apply ANY copyright license 
to work in public domain. So how can public domain be possibly 
"compatible" with the GNU GPL given that "you must cause the whole 
work to be under the GPL as per section 2(b)"? Uh GNUtian retards.

regards,
alexander.