[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU License, Again
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GNU License, Again |
Date: |
Sat, 26 May 2007 12:09:15 +0200 (CEST) |
Then what's all this talk about "virality", etc.?
Same reason why people spread FUD.
You seem to be contradicting yourself. At one moment you say that
one needs to release the combined work under GPL (which by
definition releases the original part of the program's source code
under GPL since that is part of the combined work
I have never said that, you are not required to accept the GPL. You
are free not to accept it. Please refer to the GPL instead of me for
further questions.
- Re: GNU License, Again, (continued)
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/26
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, none, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/25
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/26
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/26
Re: GNU License, Again, Keith Thompson, 2007/05/22
Re: GNU License, Again, John Hasler, 2007/05/21