[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU License, Again
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GNU License, Again |
Date: |
Sat, 26 May 2007 12:09:15 +0200 (CEST) |
> It is a _deriviate_, that is how it is dependant. It doesn't matter
> what depends on what.
Could you please at least spell the word correctly? You have been
mocked about this "deriviate" invention of yours for years now.
Existing words are "derive", "derivate" and "derivative". While
you would still not make more sense, it would look less foolish if
the terms you used actually existed.
As usual, you have nothing but personal attacks to throw.
- Re: GNU License, Again, (continued)
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, Tyler Smith, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/25
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, none, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/24