[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Software Patents
From: |
Lee Hollaar |
Subject: |
Re: Software Patents |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:08:29 -0600 (MDT) |
In article <b-edne5k16x0IefbnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@insightbb.com> rjack <rjack@com>
writes:
>Many "software-based inventions" are used in industrial control
>processes today. With today's fantastic analog IC circuit density
>available, an enormous number of very precise mathmatical functions can
>be emulated without even mentioning a digital circuit. Virtually all
>process control digital computers use A/D and D/A for I/O.
>
>How about some nice "analog based inventions" that never even mention
>"digital" or "software" that emulate exactly the processes of many
>"software based inventions"?
Not surprisingly, it would depend on how they were claimed if one
is looking at literal infringement, and whether they are equivalent
but not foreseeable at the time of the application when looking at
non-literal infringement.
- Re: Software Patents, (continued)
- Re: Software Patents, Bruce Lewis, 2007/06/20
- Re: Software Patents, rjack, 2007/06/20
- Re: Software Patents, Lee Hollaar, 2007/06/20
- Re: Software Patents, rjack, 2007/06/20
- Re: Software Patents, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/06/21
- Re: Software Patents, rjack, 2007/06/21
- Re: Software Patents, Lee Hollaar, 2007/06/21
- Re: Software Patents, dt, 2007/06/21
- Re: Software Patents, Lee Hollaar, 2007/06/21
- Re: Software Patents, rjack, 2007/06/21
- Re: Software Patents,
Lee Hollaar <=
Re: Software Patents, dt, 2007/06/20