[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?
|
From: |
Tim Smith |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:07:07 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.1 (Intel Mac OS X) |
In article <13amdf9ocjk03b@news.supernews.com>, Rick <none@nomail.com>
wrote:
> Yes, copyrights are assigned to Sun, but OO.o and all submissions use the
> LGPL.
Most of the contributions come from Sun employees. There aren't many
"outside" developers. Some who have tried have complained that it is
hard to get outside work accepted into OO.o. Thus, it's not really
accurate to say that OO.o is independent of StarOffice and Sun.
--
--Tim Smith
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, (continued)
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, spike1, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Roy Schestowitz, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Tim Smith, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/07/27
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Tim Smith, 2007/07/27
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, graeme, 2007/07/28
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Hadron, 2007/07/28
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Rick, 2007/07/28
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Rick, 2007/07/28
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?,
Tim Smith <=