[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another GNU License Question
From: |
mike3 |
Subject: |
Re: Another GNU License Question |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:03:58 -0700 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Aug 12, 9:36 pm, John Hasler <j...@dhh.gt.org> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > No, it's a license granting conditional permission for recipients of
> > copies to distribute the software. No license is required to use it.
> mike3 writes:
> > But the permission is granted to the user. I didn't say you need some
> > other license to use the GPL.
>
> In the US you don't need _any_ license to use software of which you own a
> copy. The GPL grants conditional permission to distribute. If you do not
> distribute you need not accept the GPL. You can just use the program as
> permitted by copyright law.
But the GPL does not impose a restriction on the person _creating_ the
software who intends to release it under the GPL, right?
> --
> John Hasler
> j...@dhh.gt.org
> Dancing Horse Hill
> Elmwood, WI USA
- Re: Another GNU License Question, (continued)
- Re: Another GNU License Question, John Hasler, 2007/08/20
- Re: Another GNU License Question, mike3, 2007/08/26
- Re: Another GNU License Question, David Kastrup, 2007/08/14
- Re: Another GNU License Question, mike3, 2007/08/20
- Re: Another GNU License Question, John Hasler, 2007/08/12
- Re: Another GNU License Question, mike3, 2007/08/12
- Re: Another GNU License Question, John Hasler, 2007/08/13
- Re: Another GNU License Question,
mike3 <=
- Re: Another GNU License Question, Lasse Reichstein Nielsen, 2007/08/20
- Re: Another GNU License Question, John Hasler, 2007/08/20
- Re: Another GNU License Question, mike3, 2007/08/26
- Message not available
- Re: Another GNU License Question, mike3, 2007/08/26