[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Open source licenses are /actually/ contracts?!?
From: |
Tim Tyler |
Subject: |
Re: Open source licenses are /actually/ contracts?!? |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:08:50 GMT |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0a1 (Windows/20060724) |
The saga:
http://jmri.sourceforge.net/k/docket/
The ruling:
http://jmri.sourceforge.net/k/docket/158.pdf
One bit not mentioned in the news stories:
Although Defendants represent that they have voluntarily ceased
all potentially infringing activities utilizing any of the
disputed material and although both parties conceded that the
disputed material is no longer of value (as of March 2007),
the Court cannot find as a matter of law that Defendants’ voluntary
termination of allegedly wrongful activity renders the motion for
preliminary injunction moot. “‘Voluntary cessation of challenged
conduct moots a case ... only if it is absolutely clear that the
alleged wrongful behavior would not reasonable be expected to recur.’”
Once a criminal, always a criminal ;-)
--
__________
|im |yler http://timtyler.org/ tim@tt1lock.org Remove lock to reply.
- Re: Open source licenses are /actually/ contracts?!?, (continued)
- Re: Open source licenses are /actually/ contracts?!?, Arnoud Engelfriet, 2007/08/28
- Re: Open source licenses are /actually/ contracts?!?, John Hasler, 2007/08/28
- Re: Open source licenses are /actually/ contracts?!?, Tim Tyler, 2007/08/28
- Re: Open source licenses are /actually/ contracts?!?, John Hasler, 2007/08/28
- Re: Open source licenses are /actually/ contracts?!?, Tim Tyler, 2007/08/28
- Re: Open source licenses are /actually/ contracts?!?, John Hasler, 2007/08/27
- Re: Open source licenses are /actually/ contracts?!?, Tim Tyler, 2007/08/27
Re: Open source licenses are /actually/ contracts?!?, Tim Tyler, 2007/08/28
Re: Open source licenses are /actually/ contracts?!?,
Tim Tyler <=