Re: The Modernization of Emacs: terminology buffer and keybinding

[David Kastrup]

bcd@pvv.ntnu.no (Bent C Dalager) writes:

> In article <fdtsfu$iq6$03$1@news.t-online.com>,
> Frank Goenninger  <frgo@goenninger.net> wrote:
>>
>>Well, I didn't start the discussion. So you should ask the OP about the 
>>why. I jumped in when I came across the so often mentioned "hey, it's 
>>all well defined" statement was brought in. I simply said that if that 
>>"well-definedness" is against "common understanding" then I don't give 
>>a damn about that clever definitions. Because I have to know that there 
>>are such definitions - always also knowing that free is not really 
>>free.
>
> "Liberated" is a valid meaning of the word "free".

No.  It is a valid meaning of the word "freed".

Xpost+Fup2 gnu.misc.discuss: this is not really relevant for most of
the touched Usenet groups.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum