[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Free system that could be "real Unix".
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: Free system that could be "real Unix". |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:43:37 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
mike3 writes:
> What is "Unix" defined as, then? Obviously "UNIX(tm)" is defined as
> whatever The Open Group has allowed to be branded as such, but what is
> "Unix" defined as?
You can sell it as Unix if you have permission from The Open Group. You
can call it Unix if you feel moved to do so. Personally, I call it Unix if
it looks like Unix to me. This means Linux, the BSDs, Solaris, and the
branded Unixes such as HPUX.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- Free system that could be "real Unix"., mike3, 2007/10/10
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., John Hasler, 2007/10/10
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., mike3, 2007/10/11
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., John Paul Wallington, 2007/10/12
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., Christopher Browne, 2007/10/14
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., mike3, 2007/10/16
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., Christopher Browne, 2007/10/16
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., mike3, 2007/10/17
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., John Hasler, 2007/10/17
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., Stephane CHAZELAS, 2007/10/18
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., mike3, 2007/10/17
Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., Tim Smith, 2007/10/17