[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:55:57 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
mike3 writes:
> What I mean is if you choose to use GPL code in your programs, then if
> you wish to distribute those programs, you must do so under GPL -- and
> not just the GPLed part, but the entire original part that you put your
> little heart and soul into making as well.
So choose not to use GPL code.
> What I'm talking about is where you _do_ use enough material that
> qualifies for copyright. Then since you have agreed to the terms of the
> license, you must now release any original work that uses that scrap of
> GPL code as GPL, or not release it at all (or not use the code, but
> that's understood, no?).
Yes. So what? Would you rather be told that you cannot release the source
at all and must pay $$ for every binary you distribute?
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- Re: GPL question, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/10/13
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/10/13
- Re: GPL question, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/10/13
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/10/13
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/10/13
- Re: GPL question, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/10/14
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/10/14
- Re: GPL question,
John Hasler <=
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/10/17
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/10/14
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/10/17
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/10/17
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/10/17
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/10/13
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, Mike Cox, 2007/10/13
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/10/13
- Re: GPL question, Miles Bader, 2007/10/14
- Re: GPL question, Byung-Hee HWANG, 2007/10/14