[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Free system that could be "real Unix".
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: Free system that could be "real Unix". |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:13:08 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
mike3 writes:
> For _some_ practical purposes, maybe. But I don't think I'm the only one
> that would have problems if I wrote something in terms of a standard and
> then tried to run it on something that didn't quite comply with that
> standard.
I hope you are not assuming that the fact that a system is "certified" as
complying with a standard guarantees that it actually does comply.
> Oh, don't give me that advocacy crap. ISTR that TOG was considering
> waiving the license fee for Linux if it could meet the compliance test,
> but it still hasn't happened. Maybe the Linux groupies have too big
> egos?
Or maybe no one who matters gives a damn? If you want Linux certified than
shut up and get out there and get it done. You have everything you need.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., (continued)
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., mike3, 2007/10/11
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., John Paul Wallington, 2007/10/12
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., Christopher Browne, 2007/10/14
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., mike3, 2007/10/16
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., Christopher Browne, 2007/10/16
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., mike3, 2007/10/17
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix".,
John Hasler <=
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., Stephane CHAZELAS, 2007/10/18
- Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., mike3, 2007/10/17
Re: Free system that could be "real Unix"., Tim Smith, 2007/10/17