[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL Question
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GPL Question |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:42:22 +0100 |
rjack wrote:
[... Affero GPL ...]
> If you're into the "copyleft" thing ask the people at the Free Sofware
> Foundation http://www.fsf.org/licensing/ -- it'll be legal gibberish
It would be real fun to watch FSF/SFLC "enforcing" GNU Affero*** given
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/2nd/039303p.pdf
***) http://www.fsf.org/agplv3-pr
"Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, if you modify
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
the Program, your modified version must prominently offer all users
interacting with it remotely through a computer network (if your
version supports such interaction) an opportunity to receive the
Corresponding Source of your version by providing access to the
Corresponding Source from a network server at no charge, through
some standard or customary means of facilitating copying of
software. This Corresponding Source shall include the
Corresponding Source for any work covered by version 3 of the GNU
General Public License that is incorporated pursuant to the
following paragraph."
regards,
alexander.
--
"Plaintiffs copyrights are unique and valuable property whose market
value is impossible to assess"
-- SOFTWARE FREEDOM LAW CENTER, INC.
- Re: GPL Question, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: GPL Question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/12/12
Re: GPL Question, Noah Slater, 2007/12/12
Message not available
Re: GPL Question, Ryan, 2007/12/12
Re: GPL Question, Miles Bader, 2007/12/12