[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question
|
From: |
John Hasler |
|
Subject: |
Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:06:12 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
avesty writes:
> I like the idea of the GPL and what it stands for, just not this apparent
> openness to 'interpretation'.
Then you won't like any legal document of any kind.
> It seems there should be definitive defendable answers to questions like
> the ones I have...
> ...
> That's the other reason I asked if there were lawyers that specialize
> in this sort of thing...
If you expect a definitive defendable answer from a lawyer you are going to
be disappointed. Why don't you ask the author of the GPL software? Get
written permission from him and you are safe no matter what. What software
is it?
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- GPL Mere Aggregation question, avesty, 2007/12/27
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, John Hasler, 2007/12/27
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, rjack, 2007/12/27
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, David Kastrup, 2007/12/27
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, avesty, 2007/12/27
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question,
John Hasler <=
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, Barry Margolin, 2007/12/27
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, rjack, 2007/12/28
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, avesty, 2007/12/28
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/28
- Message not available
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, rjack, 2007/12/28
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, avesty, 2007/12/28
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/28
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, John Hasler, 2007/12/30
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/12/28
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, avesty, 2007/12/28