[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dismissal with prejudice is normal
From: |
Rick |
Subject: |
Re: Dismissal with prejudice is normal |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:49:59 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:28:44 +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Linonut wrote:
> [...]
>> Thanks, Tim, for doing the legwork needed to put rjack/Terekhov's
>> jeering into proper perspective.
>
> Here's an illustration of what the lawyers he have checked with were
> talking about.
>
> http://petsforum.com/PSW/Docket/Stipulation.htm (STIPULATION OF
> SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE)
>
> That's not equivalent to
>
> http://www.terekhov.de/GPLvVerizon/VOLUNTARY_DISMISSAL.pdf
>
> regards,
> alexander.
Maybe you can show us where the GPL has been found unenforceable in court.
--
Rick
- Dismissal with prejudice is normal, Tim Smith, 2008/06/19
- Re: Dismissal with prejudice is normal, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/06/19
- Re: Dismissal with prejudice is normal, Linonut, 2008/06/19
- Re: Dismissal with prejudice is normal, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/06/19
- Re: Dismissal with prejudice is normal,
Rick <=
- Re: Dismissal with prejudice is normal, rjack, 2008/06/19
- Re: Dismissal with prejudice is normal, Rick, 2008/06/19
- Re: Dismissal with prejudice is normal, David Kastrup, 2008/06/20
- Re: Dismissal with prejudice is normal, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/06/20
- Re: Dismissal with prejudice is normal, David Kastrup, 2008/06/20
- Re: Dismissal with prejudice is normal, Ezekiel, 2008/06/20
- Re: Dismissal with prejudice is normal, The Ghost In The Machine, 2008/06/19
- Re: Dismissal with prejudice is normal, Tim Smith, 2008/06/19
- Re: Dismissal with prejudice is normal, rjack, 2008/06/19
- Re: Dismissal with prejudice is normal, Tim Smith, 2008/06/20