[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:55:56 +0200 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > So plaintiffs want to settle (having fruitless negotiations thus far)
> > and are asking delay of a conference meant to encourage defendants to
> > settle?
>
> The affidavit of service wasn't even filed until July 14.
> I expect that in this case as in so many others, court
> processes are slow and often delayed.
>
> The proof will be, once the case is over, whether the
> defendants properly make available the sources of the
> GPLed software that they are distributing. That most
> likely will be the case, because quoting from the
> complaint:
>
>
> <http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2008/jun/10/busybox/supermicro-complaint.pdf>
> 15. On February 29, 2008, through their counsel,
> Plaintiffs notified Defendant of its unlawful
> conduct based upon its failure to comply with
> the License.
> 16. On April 16, 2008, Defendants counsel provided
> Plaintiffs with source code which it represented
> to be the complete and corresponding code for the
> GPL-licensed software on the Infringing Products.
> Plaintiffs initiated a technical review of the source
> code and communicated to Defendant their other demands
> for settlement of the matter.
> 17. On April 25, 2008, through their counsel, Plaintiffs
> notified Defendant that the source provided did not
> include scripts used to control compilation and
> installation of the executable, and therefore did not
> constitute complete and corresponding source code
> within the meaning of the license.
> 18. Defendant has not responded to Plaintiffs April 25
> notice, and continues to distribute the Infringing
> Products and Firmware in violation of Plaintiffs
> exclusive rights under the Copyright Act.
>
> This means that, as usual, the defendants don't want to be
> bothered with the GPL requirements, but once they're being
> sued, they'll finally bite the bullet and do it right. Then
> the SFLC will move to have the case dismissed, and you'll
> once again treat it as a failure rather than a victory.
Man oh man. Hyman Rosen managed to find out that SFLC wants scripts...
yet "PRAYER FOR RELIEF" doesn't mention scripts.
Pre-trial conference:
Judge: What's the issue?
Defendants: SFLC wants scripts...
Judge: What does that have to do with copyright infringement?
Defendants: No idea. BTW, they've not registered copyrights and you lack
jurisdiction, judge.
Judge: (To SFLC) &*^$%%#$$%$##&^%$*^(&^% Case dismissed.
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/18
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/18
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/18
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/18
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/18
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/18
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/18
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/18
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/18
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/20
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/20
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, rjack, 2008/07/18
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, Linonut, 2008/07/19
- Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record, rjack, 2008/07/19