Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code

[Alf P. Steinbach]

* James Kanze:
> C was never really a good general purpose language.  It was
> never used (nor even usable) in commercial software, for
> example.

I'm not sure that statement is valid.

It would be very surprising, to say the least, if no or just a very few 
commercial applications were written in C.

A quick Google search did not, however, help me find commercial software written 
in any specific language (yes, I'm aware of Bjarne's old list for C++).


Cheers,

- Alf

--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?