[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: softwarecombinations paper again Re: LGPL vs. GPL
|
From: |
Tim Smith |
|
Subject: |
Re: softwarecombinations paper again Re: LGPL vs. GPL |
|
Date: |
Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:25:58 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b2 (PPC Mac OS X) |
In article <mailman.15689.1217575598.18990.gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org>,
Ciaran O'Riordan <ciaran@fsfe.org> wrote:
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> > Read the paper, [...]
>
> I did. It's drivel. Next.
>
> [Well, I skimmed it, but it was quickly obvious that a skim is all it
> deserved.]
Can you give any specific criticism?
--
--Tim Smith
- Re: softwarecombinations paper again Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2008/08/01
- Re: softwarecombinations paper again Re: LGPL vs. GPL,
Tim Smith <=
- Re: softwarecombinations paper again Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2008/08/01
- Re: softwarecombinations paper again Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Tim Smith, 2008/08/02
- Re: softwarecombinations paper again Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2008/08/02
- Re: softwarecombinations paper again Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Tim Smith, 2008/08/03
- Re: softwarecombinations paper again Re: LGPL vs. GPL, rjack, 2008/08/03
- Re: softwarecombinations paper again Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2008/08/04
- Re: softwarecombinations paper again Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/08/08
- Message not available
- Re: softwarecombinations paper again Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2008/08/08