[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: devoted freetard's thought, remembered
From: |
rjack |
Subject: |
Re: devoted freetard's thought, remembered |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:44:46 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) |
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
"Copyright license -> Copyright law Contract -> Contract law
DUH!" -- mini-RMS <rms@1407.org>
"Whether express or implied, a license is a contract 'governed by ordinary
principles of state contract law.'"; McCoy v. Mitsuboshi Cutlery, Inc., 67. F.3d
917, (United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 1995)
"Although the United States Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. ยงยง 101- 1332, grants
exclusive jurisdiction for infringement claims to the federal courts, those
courts construe copyrights as contracts and turn to the relevant state law to
interpret them."; Automation by Design, Inc. v. Raybestos Products Co., 463 F.3d
749, (United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 2006)
DUH!
Sincerely,
Rjack
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or
the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."
-- John Adams, 'Argument in Defense of the Soldiers in the Boston Massacre
Trials,' December 1770
- William Patry Copyright Blog, rjack, 2008/08/03
- Re: William Patry Copyright Blog, AES, 2008/08/04
- Re: William Patry Copyright Blog, Hyman Rosen, 2008/08/04
- Re: William Patry Copyright Blog, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/08/04
- Re: William Patry Copyright Blog, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2008/08/04
- Message not available
- Re: devoted freetard's thought, remembered, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/08/04
- Re: devoted freetard's thought, remembered, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2008/08/04
- Message not available
- Re: devoted freetard's thought, remembered, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/08/04
- Re: devoted freetard's thought, remembered,
rjack <=