[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LGPL vs. GPL
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: LGPL vs. GPL |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Aug 2008 18:19:31 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) |
JohnF wrote:
There's no law forcing authors to publish source code.
That's what decompiling and reverse engineering is for :-)
But I've got no problem with people making royalties from
> their work
My problem with it are the restrictions I'm forced to undergo
to protect their royalty stream.
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, (continued)
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, JohnF, 2008/08/06
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2008/08/05
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/08/05
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2008/08/05
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/08/05
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2008/08/06
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, JohnF, 2008/08/06
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, David Kastrup, 2008/08/05
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, JohnF, 2008/08/07
Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2008/08/05
Message not available
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, JohnF, 2008/08/06
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2008/08/06
- Message not available
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, JohnF, 2008/08/06
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2008/08/07
- Message not available
- Re: LGPL vs. GPL, John Hasler, 2008/08/07