[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PJ of Groklaw tells a story... (celebrating CAFC's utter nonsense ru
|
From: |
Moshe Goldfarb. |
|
Subject: |
Re: PJ of Groklaw tells a story... (celebrating CAFC's utter nonsense ruling) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:43:48 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 |
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:34:44 -0400, Rjack wrote:
> There is a powerful motivation on PJ and Moglen's part. If a license is
> not a *contract*, then 17 USC sec. 301's preemption provisions would not
> apply.
No doubt Eben Moglen is somewhat of a strange duck, but I'm not sure what
you mean by "their powerful motivation, ie:PJ and Moglen"
Do either of them have a vested interest in this, financial or otherwise or
is this just a matter of winning an argument/making a point?
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/