[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Battle for Wesnoth relicensing
From: |
Pete Chown |
Subject: |
Battle for Wesnoth relicensing |
Date: |
14 Sep 2008 18:05:38 GMT |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
I wondered what you guys thought of the license change which is being
proposed for Battle for Wesnoth.
As you probably know, the game is currently under GPL. It seems that the
musicians who contributed the soundtracks, and to a lesser extent some of
the graphic designers, were unclear about the implications when they
contributed their work. They thought they were only giving the right to
redistribute the work as part of Wesnoth, and didn't realise that they
were also giving the right to modify the work and use it in other
projects.
Eric Raymond has now suggested that the music and art could be licensed
under a Creative Commons licence, while the code would remain under GPL,
see http://tinyurl.com/65z9bg . To me this seems to create all sorts of
problems:
- People who have contributed code to Wesnoth are going to get upset;
they thought they were contributing to an open source project, not a
"look but don't touch" freeware project. This could cause the game to
fork.
- At least Debian and probably other Linux distributions will throw the
game out. I see this as a problem, though if you follow the link above,
you will see that many people who work on Wesnoth don't.
- ESR is suggesting using the NoDerivs option from Creative Commons.
Since Wesnoth as a whole is a derived work of its media files, I could
imagine this making it illegal to distribute the game at all. The same
problem would occur from the other end; the code would be under GPL and
the GPL says that its terms have to be applied to the entire derived work.
- If you want to say that Wesnoth is free ("speech") then surely people
should be able to change the music and the art, not just the code.
I can see that the GPL doesn't deal with media files in the best way,
because it is often unclear what the source code is. However, I have a
feeling that the Wesnoth project is about to create a legal mess for
itself, and I suppose I was wondering if other people share my worries.
Pete
- Battle for Wesnoth relicensing,
Pete Chown <=
- Re: Battle for Wesnoth relicensing, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2008/09/16
- Re: Battle for Wesnoth relicensing, Tim Smith, 2008/09/16
- Re: Battle for Wesnoth relicensing, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/17
- Re: Battle for Wesnoth relicensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/17
- Re: Battle for Wesnoth relicensing, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/17
- Re: Battle for Wesnoth relicensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/17
- Re: Battle for Wesnoth relicensing, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/17
- Re: Battle for Wesnoth relicensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/17
- Re: Battle for Wesnoth relicensing, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/17
- Re: Battle for Wesnoth relicensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/17