[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?
From: |
Rahul Dhesi |
Subject: |
Re: GPL 2(b) HUH? |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:20:40 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
nn/6.7.0 |
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> writes:
>Rahul Dhesi wrote:
>> I think you missed the part where HyProg users were copying libGNU as
>> the HyProg author's agents.
>It's not illegal to copy libGNU as authorized by the GPL.
>If I wanted to, I could ship, perhaps on separate media,
>a copy of libGNU and its sources along with HyProg.
Why did you change the example? Is it because the previous example
didn't work correctly?
--
Rahul
http://rahul.rahul.net/
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, (continued)
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/18
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/18
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/18
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/18
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/18
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/18
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/18
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/18
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/18
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/19
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?,
Rahul Dhesi <=
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/19
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/19
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/09/20
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Hyman Rosen, 2008/09/21
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rjack, 2008/09/19
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/20
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rjack, 2008/09/20
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/20
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rjack, 2008/09/20
- Re: GPL 2(b) HUH?, Rahul Dhesi, 2008/09/20