Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?

[amicus_curious]

"Hyman Rosen" <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote in message 
news:QwbCk.121$F%4.119@fe097.usenetserver.com...
> amicus_curious wrote:
> > The test would be where an infringing vendor is ordered by the
> > court to disclose the changes made to the GPL source and not
> > offered voluntarily.
>
> I don't believe this can happen. Someone infringing on the
> license can be ordered to stop infringing, and to pay statutory
> and actual damages. If they don't want to disclose their changes
> they don't have to, but then they don't get to copy and distribute.
Fair enough.  Let me state it a different way then.

The test would be where an infringing vendor is ordered by the court to 
either disclose the changes made to the GPL source or cease distributing the 
program entirely.  I would also be interested in any case where the 
infringer was ordered to pay statutory damages.