[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
|
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
|
Subject: |
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!" |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:51:35 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) |
Your post, while full of words, lacks any actual semantic
content. You might wish to consider starting your posts
with a short paragraph describing the points you wish to
make, followed by further paragraphs which flesh out those
points using pithy quotes and links just sufficient to make
your case.
- Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/11/26
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!",
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/11/26
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/11/26
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/11/27
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2008/11/27
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/11/29
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/11/30
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2008/11/26